04-16-2014, 01:06 PM
jwb Wrote:Green_Elite_Cab Wrote:I also hesitated since these are VERY modern cars, and certainly do NOT match my late 70s modeling.
That said, I had really wanted these cars since I ride them almost every time I go to New York City, and I like them alot.
This has seldom bothered me, and I don't believe it bothered John Allen -- whose modeling still has a great deal of appeal, since graffen has posted a new plan inspired by the G&D. I think John Allen had two big insights. One is that, although the era of equipment may vary, its function remains very similar over decades and now even centuries. A switcher is a switcher. A flat car is a flat car. But also, there's a lot of slop in what we see: there are plenty of Railboxes out there with 40-year-old paint. The UP stirs things up by restoring a Big Boy. Allen saw a layout as a way to experience and celebrate all this.
Its funny you mentioned railbox cars, I just saw a bunch that were so faded out that you could barely make out that "X" logo!
In any case, this is more of a budgetary question than a time period nitpick. I have to prioritize what I really want to make the best of the money I can devote to the hobby.
If I had unlimited funds, I wouldn't think twice about picking up the trains I liked, regardless of what time period or prototype they were. Using the prototype time-range as criteria for making a purchase is a good way to screen out models that aren't necessary, and lets me devote money towards other applicable projects that most further my goals.
Also, if I was modeling the modern day, and used some old stuff, that would be OK. If I'm modeling the past, visitors from the future are out of place.
Modeling New Jersey Under the Wire 1978-1979.
![[Image: logosmall.png]](http://i543.photobucket.com/albums/gg445/CAB_IV/Model%20Trains%202013/logosmall.png)