![]() |
Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" here? - Printable Version +- (https://bigbluetrains.com) +-- Forum: Photographer's right of way (https://bigbluetrains.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +--- Forum: Shutterbug area (https://bigbluetrains.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" here? (/showthread.php?tid=202) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
|
Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - e-paw - 04-24-2017 "What's the issue, Steve? Charlie's photo fulfils the rules, " Not at all sir.. I had just read a post where a new member had asked what where the rules for this thread. I had answered it with my post, and when I look back at it now, the post asking the question is now missing. :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: it should be just ahead of my post, maybe I am just seeing things, or need more sleep, but I would have bet my life that it was there. Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - doctorwayne - 04-24-2017 Thanks for the clarification Steve. I didn't see that person's post when I replied to you, hence my response. Perhaps he intended to contribute, then realised that whatever he had didn't fit the criteria. Let's hope he returns, as I enjoy watching and participating in this thread. Wayne Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - Charlie B - 04-24-2017 I couldn't figure it out either, but Steve made me do some research on CR 3004, and I found some odd facts (or not facts) so it is all ways fun, buit I know Steves feeling. That has happened to me too. ![]() Charlie Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - e-paw - 04-24-2017 I don't remember the name on the post with the rule question, but the avatar was a selfie stile pic . Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - bdw9535 - 04-25-2017 Charlie B Wrote:And Bruce has proof that this locomotive was still 3004 in 1994 when, according to Don Ross it was supposed to have been renumbered to 3018 in April of 76, and isn't listed on the rosters I have found.Charlie, I rechecked the date on the photo and it is August of 1994. I did a search thru Google and found a pic of CR 3004 leading a freight thru Columbiana, OH dated 12/22/94 on Railroad Pictured Archives. Went thru my CR books and found in "Conrail the Final Years 1992-1997" by Paul Withers, that CR 3004 was listed as being retired on 9/25/90, brought back into service and then again retired again on 7/20/93. In the same book they also have a photo of 3004 in use at Millville, NJ on 6/19/95. With the info from my photo, the one from RR Pictures Archives and from Withers book have no clue when 3004 was retired or if it was ever renumbered. Bruce I've been away for some weeks and came home to find my computer not allowing me to access the internet. My cable company advises that everything is OK on their end, so until the problem is resolved I won't be able to post pics on Big Blue. Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - Charlie B - 04-25-2017 Thanks for your research Bruce, It just proves that the railroads can slip some stuff by us. The original is supposed to be a GP38 and the one I posted is a dash 2 (I think) but I don't know them that well. I notice the first 3004 lacks ditch lights so it may have been in and out of storage, I also found one roster that said after the renumbering the unit was sold to Maine Central..I need to remember this for a time when someone says they are right because they found it on the internet... This makes this that much more fun and if Steve hadn't been hit by a "Bait and switch ![]() Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - bdw9535 - 05-01-2017 Going off of Charlie's last pic of NS GP40-2 3004, NS GP40-2 3026 at Vineland, NJ on March 11, 2011. Bruce Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - doctorwayne - 06-04-2017 Time to re-awaken this thread. Here's some more Conrail, at Niagara Falls, NY, I think... ![]() Wayne Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - Charlie B - 06-05-2017 Here's the same unit trailing at Rochester, Pa, December, 1978. Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - bdw9535 - 06-05-2017 More Conrail at Hazelton, PA July 1989 Bruce Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - Charlie B - 06-05-2017 More cabeese, East Palestine, Ohio. 8/18/1977 Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - bdw9535 - 06-06-2017 Bridgeport, NJ, December 18, 2016. Bruce Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - doctorwayne - 06-06-2017 Grimsby, Ontario... ![]() Wayne Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - Charlie B - 06-06-2017 May, 1979, Ashtabula Ohio area. Re: Would anyone be interested in the "Photography Game" her - bdw9535 - 06-06-2017 Red Caboose Motel at Strasburg, PA, March 24, 2016. Bruce |