12-31-2010, 09:19 AM
I'm not familiar with this particular situation, but is a railroad involved? If the building sits on RR property, even if abandoned, the RR is paying taxes on the "improved" property during the time it takes for the preservation efforts to take place. I am sure the RR wants the tax burden, and the burden of liability of the abandoned structure, off their books.
I do, however, agree that it is a shame to see another old station get demolished.
I do, however, agree that it is a shame to see another old station get demolished.
-Dave