Dan's N Scale layout project
#1
I recently returned to railroad modelling after a 14 year break, and at first decided to build a small switching layout. To shake off the cobwebs and learn what had changed as well as new skills, I decided to join a model railway club. This proved problematic at first with none of the ones I tried at first even working in N scale, and all their interests being British Steam Era. Eventually I was ready to give up, until I thought about trying one last club in the nearest city to where I live - imagine my surprise to find that not only did they have a large N scale layout being worked on, it was American too!

I signed up straight away, and after working on the club layout for a few months I've decided to start up my own home layout again.

After learning a heck of lot from the other members of my local model railway society, I have scrapped the switching layout and begun to build a larger, more organic layout based on the design philosophies of the leader of our N scale section.

I have no plan, no design to work to, other than that it will be continuous with switching potential, and at least double track with a shortline thrown in for good measure. I have a tapering space, 10 feet long, 6 feet free at one end and about 3-5 feet free at the other. Starting on one side with a freight yard, which will be my visible staging, adjacent to which will be a double track main line, as well as an elevated shortline, which will include a section of street running and an intermodel yard in the top left corner of the upper level, as well as potential other industries for switching interest.

Where it goes from there... time will tell. Smile

I am building more framework between times when I am working on the club layout. We shall see how it progresses.

Here are photos of the progress so far, apologies though - it is pretty messy!

[Image: 20140107_220321-1_zps1794f1bb.jpg]
[Image: 20140107_220336-1_zpsb38b5f28.jpg]
[Image: 20140107_220345-1_zpse39fddae.jpg]
[Image: 20140107_220353-1_zps81dc70e3.jpg]
Reply
#2
Hi Dan and Welcome ! You have overcome the biggest challenge to building a layout and that is you can't build one until you start which you have. It's good to hear you found some other modelers who also model in the ONLY correct scale! Icon_lol . We will be looking forward to your progress.
Mike

Sent from my pocket calculator using two tin cans and a string
Reply
#3
Thanks Mike, to hear praise from you - even this early into a project is heartening; your layout is a true inspiration for me. Smile

Onward, as they say:
[Image: 20140110_182525_zpsd4c42c82.jpg]
Reply
#4
Tyson Rayles Wrote:It's good to hear you found some other modelers who also model in the ONLY correct scale! Icon_lol . We will be looking forward to your progress.

Mike, you know me, I've run a train on your excellent layout, and you know I mean this in jest - - - -
the ONLY correct scale ????
Or,.........
the ONLY correct scale. Wink Big Grin Big Grin
I've built in both, and HO, and 1:700,1:72, 1:25, 1:96, 1:244, 1:64, ad infinitum ad nausium.

1:700 scale DD770
   
This is one of the ( if I remember correctly ) Woodland Scenics "Styrofoam layouts" in N scale, that I did most of the scenery on.    
Big Grin Big Grin The "correct scale" is the one you are comfortable working in. Wink Smile Smile
There are people in SciFi modeling, working in 1:2256 scale !! ( a 40' box car in that scale would be 0.213 inches long ) THAT, is a bit too small for my "old fingers" and "Tired eyesight" :o Wink Smile
We always learn far more from our own mistakes, than we will ever learn from another's advice.
The greatest place to live life, is on the sharp leading edge of a learning curve.
Lead me not into temptation.....I can find it myself!
Reply
#5
Yeah Pete I know there are a lot of very nice, talented but misguided people out there. Icon_lol As you know I work in HO and O at work and N at home.
Mike

Sent from my pocket calculator using two tin cans and a string
Reply
#6
I must be having a hearing problem this morning.I could swear Mike just admitted to working with those abNormal scales, Eek Nope
Johnathan (Catt) Edwards
"The Ol Furrball"

"I'm old school,I still believe in respect"
Reply
#7
O gauge scares me. So much detail you have to get right or it looks like a train set and not a layout. You can get away with more in N Smile

For those interested, this is my layout space so far:
[Image: 20140110_202423-1_zpse264f4e2.jpg]

And here's what the extension currently looks like:[Image: 20140110_203354_zpscebf9d74.jpg]
Reply
#8
"O gauge scares me. So much detail you have to get right or it looks like a train set and not a layout. You can get away with more in N " Cheers


You are right on the money Dan. Thumbsup The only easier scale to model in than N would be Z except it is so expensive Eek and has so little American prototype stuff available. It's good to see you are moving right along, hope to see trains running soon.
Mike

Sent from my pocket calculator using two tin cans and a string
Reply
#9
" O scale scares me. So much detail you have to get right "
Yeah, but then again, it's "larger", therefore Icon_twisted "easier detail, to model". Wink
   
(( The engine is a Bachmann On30 Mogul, with the boiler extended, on an Athearn Genesis 2-8-2 chassis...+ brass castings.))
The forest scene painting used as a backdrop helps make the scene look better.

Look at it this way, it could be "Gawd I have to model every single nut and bolt...and the threads on each bit of exposed bolt !!" scale. 357 357 357

The sobering thought is how much more layout you could build on a postage stamp, in "T" scale. Wink Nope not me. Wink

That said, Dan, I'm looking forward to seeing your N scale empire grow, you are off to a good start.
We always learn far more from our own mistakes, than we will ever learn from another's advice.
The greatest place to live life, is on the sharp leading edge of a learning curve.
Lead me not into temptation.....I can find it myself!
Reply
#10
This is part of a display I built for "GC Laser" N scale kits. The diorama is 2' X 8', in two sections.
   
We always learn far more from our own mistakes, than we will ever learn from another's advice.
The greatest place to live life, is on the sharp leading edge of a learning curve.
Lead me not into temptation.....I can find it myself!
Reply
#11
I managed a little progress on the layout yesterday, here are a couple of pictures:

[Image: 20140112_113046-1_zps78cecbbf.jpg]

[Image: 20140112_113028_zpsc82d350f.jpg]
Reply
#12
Thumbsup I like the over under effect.
Mike

Sent from my pocket calculator using two tin cans and a string
Reply
#13
Cheers Mike, I'm hoping it will help disguise how busy the trackage is/will be - I've got to squeeze a lot of layout in a relatively small space.
Reply
#14
Not much to report at the moment as I've been busy getting some xbox time in whilst my wife has been distracted by the Elder Scrolls Online, but I'd rather not neglect the thread so here is a basic first draft of the track plan.

Note that everything here is subject to change - even the parts I've already built! Icon_lol

[Image: 20140107_164650-1_zpsbb159a3d.jpg]
Reply
#15
Keeping in mind I'm a less is more kinda guy it looks like you might want to thin out the track work some to keep your curve radius' from being too sharp and so you can use higher numbered turnouts. That said I might not be reading it right either Icon_lol .
Mike

Sent from my pocket calculator using two tin cans and a string
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)